Stay in the Loop
Be the first to receive updates from Enfield Caribbean Association by subscribing to our email list.
You can unsubscribe anytime. We respect your privacy!

A hostile environment: language, race, surveillance and the media is the second of two reports analysing the language used in parliamentary and media debates. It shows how the UK government and media are complicit in enabling racist violence.
This report provides analysis from two datasets of a combined 62.7 million words, collected across 52,990 news articles and 317 House of Commons debates on immigration. In the period between 2019-2024, ‘illegal’ remains the number one association for ‘immigrants’ and has moved up from fourth to second most strongly associated term for ‘migrant’ in the news data.
The report details the continued use of racist tropes and stereotypes, including representations of Muslim migrant men as threats to women, and associations of migrants with deception and laziness.
The British media and politicians have played a key role in creating a culture in which racial discrimination is not just permissible but increasingly normalised. In parliamentary debates and media reporting, negative terms like “illegal”, “flood” and “influx” are persistently used in association with migrants, posing them as a threat, dangerous and outsiders.
News and parliamentary debates confect claims about migrants exploiting state resources and being a burden to the UK taxpayer, even though migrants tend to add more than they actually take. People seeking asylum are almost universally negatively represented and treated with suspicion.
Other key findings include:
Dr Shabna Begum, CEO of the Runnymede Trust, said:
“This report once again highlights how mainstream narratives, uncritically recycled and compounded by the media, create the conditions in which migrants and people seeking asylum in this country are routinely and actively demonised and dehumanised.
Whether it is Starmer reaching back to Powellite rhetoric in his now infamous ‘Island of Strangers’ speech, or MPs imagining the public safety threat posed by Muslim women’s clothing, words have consequences. They incite insecurity and hatred and they foster violence.
We all deserve better than this pantomime politics that offers us easy villains but deals with none of the urgent economic issues that are the real cause of hardship and inequality.”